Spotify Backtracks on Public Podcast Play Counts Amid Creator Backlash: What Does it Mean for the Future of Podcasting?

Spotify recently announced the introduction of public play counts for podcasts, sparking immediate controversy among podcasters. The initial plan aimed to help listeners discover new shows, but the proposal was met with strong criticism, particularly from smaller creators who feared it would exacerbate the existing popularity gap. Now, Spotify has partially reversed course, limiting public play counts to shows with at least 50,000 plays. But is this enough to quell the concerns, and what does it mean for the future of podcasting?

The original announcement was touted as a means of “helping attract new fans,” by providing a tangible metric of popularity. However, many podcasters worried it would further promote already successful podcasts while making smaller shows less appealing. Adrienne Cruz, a podcast manager for smaller shows, voiced concerns about the “social media-ification” of podcasts, emphasizing that the podcasting space has traditionally been a fertile ground for small creators.

Spotify's revised approach now only displays play counts on shows exceeding 50,000 plays, using milestone markers like “50K plays,” “100K plays,” or “1 million plays.” This aims to strike a balance between providing listeners with some insight into a podcast's popularity and avoiding the potentially discouraging effect of low play counts for smaller shows. The company stated in a blog post that this update reflects their “evolutionary efforts to provide the best insights for creators and a clear experience for their fans.”

However, the issue runs deeper than just visibility. Podcasters have also expressed frustration regarding the lack of a standardized metric for what constitutes a “play” across different platforms. While the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) strives to establish a clear definition for dealmaking, inconsistencies persist. Spotify clarifies that its play counts refer to the number of times “people actively tried” the content, while streams and downloads are only counted after 60 seconds of engagement.

The implications of this shift are significant. Before this, podcasting thrived as a medium refreshingly different from YouTube or other online video platforms where view counts heavily influence perception. The lack of readily available metrics helped level the playing field, allowing niche creators to find their audience without the pressure of competing with established heavyweights.

The introduction of "Plays" by Spotify could potentially turn podcasting into a "popularity contest", leading listeners and advertisers to focus on high-play episodes rather than discovering unique content.

Spotify has acknowledged these concerns and is considering further adjustments. They've assured users that they are actively looking into making the feature more equitable, including potentially offering an option to hide play counts. Furthermore, Spotify clarified that the current play counts only reflect data from their platform, acknowledging that this could mislead listeners and brand partners by not accounting for listens on other platforms.

Will Spotify's adjustments be enough to satisfy creators and maintain the diverse ecosystem of the podcasting world? The future of podcast discovery and creator support on Spotify hangs in the balance. What are your thoughts? Share your opinions in the comments below!

• Podcasters
• Podcasts
• Spotify