Lunar Mining Race & Heritage at Risk: The Looming Legal Gaps in Space Law

The race to the Moon is heating up, with nations and private companies vying for lunar resources. But as mining operations and potential lunar bases become closer to reality, a crucial question lingers: Does space law adequately protect historical sites and ensure responsible resource utilization? A recent UN working group has released draft principles for space resource activities, but fundamental legal gaps remain, potentially jeopardizing humanity's lunar legacy.

April 2025 saw significant activity, from celebrity space tourism to critical discussions at the UN regarding lunar resource extraction. The UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space is attempting to create rules for mining on the Moon and other celestial bodies. However, legal experts like Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz, a space lawyer and co-founder of For All Moonkind, warn that the current framework may be insufficient.

The Outer Space Treaty of 1967, signed by over 115 nations, establishes that space exploration is the "province of all humankind," prohibiting territorial claims. However, this nonappropriation principle leads to complex legal questions. Can companies protect investments in lunar mines? What happens when multiple entities compete for the same resources?

Article IX of the treaty requires countries to show "due regard" for the interests of others, a vague standard open to interpretation. This, combined with Article XII, which assumes the existence of lunar installations like bases, creates loopholes that could allow the first entity to arrive at a location to exclude others. "The first entity to any spot will have a unilateral opportunity to determine what’s legally 'reasonable,'" explains Gabrynowicz. The current draft U.N. principles do not address these loopholes.

The lunar south pole, with its water ice and peaks of eternal light, is a prime target for upcoming missions. The U.S. Artemis program plans to return humans to the Moon by 2028, and China aims to do so by 2030. Meanwhile, over 100 robotic missions are planned. This influx of activity endangers existing historical sites, including the landing sites of Luna 2, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, China’s Chang’e 4, and India’s Chandrayaan-3.

These sites represent humanity's first steps beyond Earth and deserve protection. NASA has previously recommended establishing safety zones around U.S. artifacts, but these are voluntary guidelines. The international community has agreed to protect cultural heritage on Earth through the 1972 World Heritage Convention, but these protocols don't extend to space.

The article also references to broader issues, new technologies, platforms, and industries are impacting regulations and borders, and it's no longer clear which laws apply, who enforces them, or where authority begins and ends, it's forcing lawmakers, courts, and businesses to rethink legal boundaries, space law is one small (pun intended) segment of that. Legal disputes in space will become increasingly important.

As more lunar missions are launched, a clear legal framework is essential to avoid conflicts, protect historical sites, and ensure responsible resource management. The draft U.N. principles are a step in the right direction, but further action is needed to address the existing legal gaps and protect humanity's lunar heritage.

What steps should international organizations take to balance resource extraction with historical preservation on the Moon? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

• Moon
• NASA
• SpaceX